hpandey
10-09 01:42 PM
If your I-94 expires you will be out of status ... it would be best if you take your new passport and travel outside immediatly before its expiration so that you can get a new I-94. The earlier IO probably didn't give you an I-94 till 2010 because your passport was expiring within 6 months.
I think you need to act on it urgently.
I have the same issue. My wife I-94 was issued based on her passport expiry date and not on her I-797 expiry date. I called up my attorney and she told that the best way to deal with this issue is to travel out of the country. If anybody had renewed it without making a travel, please post here.
[QUOTE=gc_dreamer_485;180725]Hi Folks,
I had been to canada to get my Visa stamped for my 7th in March'07. At the time i was entering United States, the immigration officer did not issue the I-94 to the validity of visa since my passport was expiring on Oct 27th 2007...
I think you need to act on it urgently.
I have the same issue. My wife I-94 was issued based on her passport expiry date and not on her I-797 expiry date. I called up my attorney and she told that the best way to deal with this issue is to travel out of the country. If anybody had renewed it without making a travel, please post here.
[QUOTE=gc_dreamer_485;180725]Hi Folks,
I had been to canada to get my Visa stamped for my 7th in March'07. At the time i was entering United States, the immigration officer did not issue the I-94 to the validity of visa since my passport was expiring on Oct 27th 2007...
wallpaper Lara Flynn Boyle
anirudh74
01-26 03:59 PM
I made a one time contribution myself but I have a feeling that IV is going away from the goal of increasing EB visas and just focusing on the 485 filing.Many people that have contributed earlier feel that by prioritizing the 485 filing over increase of EB visas, IV has gone away from atleast some of stakeholders .The stakeholders were promised initially that increase of EB visas would be a top priority or atleast on a even keel with any other objectives, but now we are in phased approach.I have talked to lot of people and the feeling is same.
GCBy3000
07-19 05:18 PM
Why not? They have to send the receipt notice on time. They have to send AP / EAD within certain days. Immigrants plan certain events based on these laws. If anyone decides to prepare and file a lawsuit for not getting EAD, he/she could do it now as per the law. Some one said, there is a law that they should be giving EAD in 90 days.
Again EAD is valid for only one year. You have to file in advance and you will get one year from the date of filing or approval I am not sure. If you dont get EAD on time, then youare not supposed to work. PERIOD. If this happens a lot, then lawsuit is for sure from someone like me who have family with two kids and play by rules. I have strong backing of my company HR.
If I interpret correctly you are saying because USCIS will not like to work on so many EADs and APs year after year AND SO they themselves will seek increase in annual GC numbers to clear up the mess. I wish your predictions would turn out to be true.:)
However, if enough EB GC numbers are not available, USCIS can not be repsonsibe for this. They have corrected the one mistake they did with the visa bulletin fiasco. I don't see any other basis for additional lawsuits.
Again EAD is valid for only one year. You have to file in advance and you will get one year from the date of filing or approval I am not sure. If you dont get EAD on time, then youare not supposed to work. PERIOD. If this happens a lot, then lawsuit is for sure from someone like me who have family with two kids and play by rules. I have strong backing of my company HR.
If I interpret correctly you are saying because USCIS will not like to work on so many EADs and APs year after year AND SO they themselves will seek increase in annual GC numbers to clear up the mess. I wish your predictions would turn out to be true.:)
However, if enough EB GC numbers are not available, USCIS can not be repsonsibe for this. They have corrected the one mistake they did with the visa bulletin fiasco. I don't see any other basis for additional lawsuits.
2011 LARA FLYNN BOYLE BLOG
onemorecame
06-22 04:21 PM
Hi All,
Its seems that my approved EAD card lost from mailbox (seems like post man delivered it in diff mail box instead of mine).. It�s been more than 15 days of approval but no card in the mail.
I contact customer service and they said wait for 30 days otherwise file new one. I am not sure what are the option I have if I won�t receive my card on time? My existing EAD is expiring within next 25 days. Is there any way that I can get my card back or USCIS issue new card without filling new one?
Thanks in advance
Onemorecame
Its seems that my approved EAD card lost from mailbox (seems like post man delivered it in diff mail box instead of mine).. It�s been more than 15 days of approval but no card in the mail.
I contact customer service and they said wait for 30 days otherwise file new one. I am not sure what are the option I have if I won�t receive my card on time? My existing EAD is expiring within next 25 days. Is there any way that I can get my card back or USCIS issue new card without filling new one?
Thanks in advance
Onemorecame
more...
sjhugoose
January 30th, 2004, 11:32 AM
If Paul's hunch that we'll see the 1Ds' successor by September is correct, then we might see cheaper 1D-II bodies prior to that.
As for the Kodak, it certainly has the resolution, but it doesn't seem as if it's generating much enthusiasm. The 1Ds (with less pixels) OTOH has. Removing the very expensive anti-aliasing filter was probably not Kodak's greatest moment.
I think the Kodak has alot more problems than just AA problems!!!
And any time a product drops by 50% in 1 year its normally not a good sign
Scott
As for the Kodak, it certainly has the resolution, but it doesn't seem as if it's generating much enthusiasm. The 1Ds (with less pixels) OTOH has. Removing the very expensive anti-aliasing filter was probably not Kodak's greatest moment.
I think the Kodak has alot more problems than just AA problems!!!
And any time a product drops by 50% in 1 year its normally not a good sign
Scott
voldemar
03-02 03:20 PM
do you know where i can find the exact text to make this certain?
or is there any?Only H1B expenses should be paid by employer. If employer pays anything else - it's his good will.
or is there any?Only H1B expenses should be paid by employer. If employer pays anything else - it's his good will.
more...
grimus
12-11 03:19 PM
Yes, I am definitely for this idea that we should petition/ask USCIS to change the rules to allow those with approved I-140 to be able to file I-485 while their PD is not yet current even if we would pay US$5,000.:rolleyes:
I would second this proposal. This will definitely ease some of the pains of retrogression.
I would second this proposal. This will definitely ease some of the pains of retrogression.
2010 Lara Flynn Boyle arrives at
ravi98
09-24 10:37 AM
The GOP "Pledge": What's Not In It | Mother Jones (http://motherjones.com/mojo/2010/09/gop-pledge-whats-not-it)
The House Republicans on Thursday released a manifesto outlining what they intend to do should they triumph in the coming congressional elections. The glossy document, which is adorned with photographs of the Statue of Liberty, Mt. Rushmore, and cowboys, is high-mindedly titled "A Pledge to America: A New Governing Agenda Built on the Priorities of Our Nation, the Principles We Stand For & America's Founding Values." And it offers few surprises: tax cuts for all (including the super-rich), slashing federal spending (without specifying actual targets), downsizing government, more money for the military (especially missile defense), and repealing the health care bill.
You can read it yourself. Or peruse the reviews:......But here's a short-cut for you. Below is a list of words and phrases and the number of times they are each mentioned in the 45-page "Pledge."
Wall Street: 0
Bank: 0
Finance: 0
Mortgage crisis: 0
Derivative: 0
Subprime: 0
Lobbying: 0
Lobbyist: 0
K Street: 0
Campaign finance: 0
Campaign contribution: 0
Campaign donation: 0
Disclosure: 0
Climate change: 0
Environment: 1 ("political environment")
Alternative energy: 0
Renewable: 0
Green: 0
Transportation: 0
Infrastructure: 0
Poverty: 0
Food: 0
Food safety: 0
Housing: 0
Internet: 0
Education: 0
College: 0
Reading: 0
Science: 0
Research: 0
Technology: 0
Bush administration: 0
That list is as telling as the actual contents.
The House Republicans on Thursday released a manifesto outlining what they intend to do should they triumph in the coming congressional elections. The glossy document, which is adorned with photographs of the Statue of Liberty, Mt. Rushmore, and cowboys, is high-mindedly titled "A Pledge to America: A New Governing Agenda Built on the Priorities of Our Nation, the Principles We Stand For & America's Founding Values." And it offers few surprises: tax cuts for all (including the super-rich), slashing federal spending (without specifying actual targets), downsizing government, more money for the military (especially missile defense), and repealing the health care bill.
You can read it yourself. Or peruse the reviews:......But here's a short-cut for you. Below is a list of words and phrases and the number of times they are each mentioned in the 45-page "Pledge."
Wall Street: 0
Bank: 0
Finance: 0
Mortgage crisis: 0
Derivative: 0
Subprime: 0
Lobbying: 0
Lobbyist: 0
K Street: 0
Campaign finance: 0
Campaign contribution: 0
Campaign donation: 0
Disclosure: 0
Climate change: 0
Environment: 1 ("political environment")
Alternative energy: 0
Renewable: 0
Green: 0
Transportation: 0
Infrastructure: 0
Poverty: 0
Food: 0
Food safety: 0
Housing: 0
Internet: 0
Education: 0
College: 0
Reading: 0
Science: 0
Research: 0
Technology: 0
Bush administration: 0
That list is as telling as the actual contents.
more...
sixburgh
08-18 01:09 AM
Both me and my wife are working on EAD.
Our AOS is pending since the July 2007 surge.
My company lawyer recently renewed my H1 (to have it as a backup) and also suggested that we renew my wife's H4.
I received my H1 approval and wife received her H4 approval.
I also visited India and re-entered USA on a new H1 stamp.
My lawyer himself is worried now whether he got my wife into H4 status since her approval in May and that since she continued working, he is worried that she technically "worked while on H4" which is not allowed, based on the last action rule.
Can you advise if we have created any issue by renewing her h4?
Also what is the remedy for this.
According to me this should be of NO issues, since a person is allowed to maintain his/her H status while AOS is pending, as per the dual intent doctrine. Also I think the last action rule is applicable within a specific category. For example when a person applies for h1/h4 at almost the same time, both are non-immigrant categories, then if USCIS approves h1 first and h4 later, then the last action rule would get applied and technically person would become h4. BUT this should not affect the AOS application since its a totally different category, thats a immigrant category.
Please advise if we did anything wrong by renewing her H4 and any solution to fix this.
Our AOS is pending since the July 2007 surge.
My company lawyer recently renewed my H1 (to have it as a backup) and also suggested that we renew my wife's H4.
I received my H1 approval and wife received her H4 approval.
I also visited India and re-entered USA on a new H1 stamp.
My lawyer himself is worried now whether he got my wife into H4 status since her approval in May and that since she continued working, he is worried that she technically "worked while on H4" which is not allowed, based on the last action rule.
Can you advise if we have created any issue by renewing her h4?
Also what is the remedy for this.
According to me this should be of NO issues, since a person is allowed to maintain his/her H status while AOS is pending, as per the dual intent doctrine. Also I think the last action rule is applicable within a specific category. For example when a person applies for h1/h4 at almost the same time, both are non-immigrant categories, then if USCIS approves h1 first and h4 later, then the last action rule would get applied and technically person would become h4. BUT this should not affect the AOS application since its a totally different category, thats a immigrant category.
Please advise if we did anything wrong by renewing her H4 and any solution to fix this.
hair Photo 1 | Lara Flynn Boyle
guygeek007
11-20 09:54 AM
Take a look @ this link
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=10645
I was in a wait state for 16 months until my 140 was cleared earlier this month. Continue business as usual, your case will eventually go thru if all your docs are in place and your case is clean ( no 3 yr Ed issues).
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=10645
I was in a wait state for 16 months until my 140 was cleared earlier this month. Continue business as usual, your case will eventually go thru if all your docs are in place and your case is clean ( no 3 yr Ed issues).
more...
pointlesswait
05-31 09:54 AM
in that case it ...we should have a wall of shame section & tag members...;)
but the point is how much of micromanagement can u do on a "free" forum!
anyway..
HateIV was an extreme case..
What happens to an employee at any company who has done something positive but has been caught abusing his colleagues a few times. He gets warned by HR first and then gets fired right.
We have lot of things to focus on to get relief for our community and there is no reason to tolerate this behaviour towards fellow members.
but the point is how much of micromanagement can u do on a "free" forum!
anyway..
HateIV was an extreme case..
What happens to an employee at any company who has done something positive but has been caught abusing his colleagues a few times. He gets warned by HR first and then gets fired right.
We have lot of things to focus on to get relief for our community and there is no reason to tolerate this behaviour towards fellow members.
hot Lara Flynn Boyle Photos
indigo10
03-01 09:54 PM
Thanks for your kind reply. Yes this amount of 40K is what i saved from my salary after my employer deducts taxes via withholding. I am confused because I read that you have to declare any foriegn accounts help while filling for taxes here in US. I made these trasnfers to my dad's account and I dont have any NRI account. I am not sure if I will fall into this category and have to declare all this. Thanks again for your help.
You dont fall in to that category and as several members mentioned you dont have to pay taxes for remittances as you already paid tax while earning it.
You dont fall in to that category and as several members mentioned you dont have to pay taxes for remittances as you already paid tax while earning it.
more...
house Lara Flynn Boyle Car
vkotval
04-06 10:34 PM
Like rollover minutes for a mobile phone plan .... I think we should propose USCIS to rollover the unused visa numbers to the next year. :D
tattoo lara flynn boyle 2011,
coolio
06-14 06:14 PM
Exactly....I don't say this a trick by USCIS to divert our attention but that will definitely be the result. Everyone here (except with the older priority dates) will face retrogression very soon. Please try to understand this folks.
Everyone will file for 485 and will get stuck in the backlog, before you know if, it will be Oct-08 and then they will scrap the old system and make everybody file under the point system. Which of course would be a nightmare as the USCIS or one of its derivatives would not be able to cope with the flood of application. At the end of the day all of us would be 1000s of dollar down and would still be posting here complaining about the process.
Bottom line is, with a limit of 20 amendments, one can be assured there won't be one looking out for us out on the fringes.
Everyone will file for 485 and will get stuck in the backlog, before you know if, it will be Oct-08 and then they will scrap the old system and make everybody file under the point system. Which of course would be a nightmare as the USCIS or one of its derivatives would not be able to cope with the flood of application. At the end of the day all of us would be 1000s of dollar down and would still be posting here complaining about the process.
Bottom line is, with a limit of 20 amendments, one can be assured there won't be one looking out for us out on the fringes.
more...
pictures Lara Flynn Boyle
bestin
10-09 01:21 PM
BTB i have read in a forum sometime back that they do renewal at Airports.Not sure on the truthfulness of this info though.If this helps.....
dresses lara flynn boyle nude pics
pappu
02-11 03:10 PM
EAD bole too....Daily Ticket
GC bole too....Quaterly Pass
Illegal Immigrant....without ticket...:).....freeloader
And what is ctizenship?
Lifetime pass :)
GC bole too....Quaterly Pass
Illegal Immigrant....without ticket...:).....freeloader
And what is ctizenship?
Lifetime pass :)
more...
makeup Lara Flynn Boyle Perfection
kumar1
05-06 04:37 PM
Missouri State -- Same thing -- They denied my wife's application to give her in-state tuition. I threatened to file a law suit and proved them that CBHE (Central Board for Higher Education) rules are on my side. University interprets those rules in their favor. After 4 months, my wife got in-state; we saved some 20K in tuition over 24 months. After that they changed the rules and now it specifically says � you have to have a GC!
DO NOT GIVE UP! This is a capitalist country and everyone wants more money.
DO NOT GIVE UP! This is a capitalist country and everyone wants more money.
girlfriend lara flynn boyle
johnimmi
01-08 10:39 AM
Her visa stamp was expiring on 15Feb07 and she entered US in Dec'06 and she was carrying the extended H4 I-797 valid till 2009. The officer at POE gave the I-94 valid only till 15Feb07. I did lot of research and found the last action on I-94 invalidates the previous ones. So her I-94 was valid only till 15Feb07. I went to the local CBP office and the officer understood what I'm talking about. He took copy of I-94 and issued a new I-94. He faxed it to some company which keeps the I-94 database.
So if possible it's better to go in person and explain. My 2 cents.
I am in a similar situation. "guyfromsg" , you are correct about the 'last action rule'.
1) My old Visa(stamped on my passport) was from Oct 1 2005 - Oct 1 2008.
2) In 04/07, I moved to a new employer. New I797(and its corresponding I-94) is from 04/2007 - 04/2010.
3) Travelled outside US. Before returning, I didn't stamp a new Visa because my old Visa was still good. When returned in Jan 2008, at the POE , the officer issued a new I-94 and stamped the expiry date as Oct 1 2008. He mentioned that since the old visa was expiring on 2008 and because I didn't have a new Visa stamped (even though I had a new 797A) , he can't stamp the I-94 with the '2010' expiration date.
4) My attorney just raised a red flag. He mentioned that the 'last action rule' goes against me. The last
action in this case was 'issuance of a new I-94'. So, the best approach is to get it corrected at the
local CBP - Deferred Inspections Office. He is working on getting some paper work ready.
However, another way to get by this issue would have been to file for a H1-B renewal before my
new I-94(the one issued at the POE) expired.
My attorney explained that according to the new immigration laws, the CBP officer should have stamped the expiration date from the 'LATEST' 797A. Most of the times, the officer will just detach your
I-94 from the latest 797-A and stamp it. This way no one(foreign national + Customs) needs to maintain multiple I-94's. However, not all officers are updated with the current immigration laws and policies. Now I'm waiting for some response from the CBP. I will update this thread once I get some positive feedback.
Thanks for all the great info in this thread guys!!
regards
John.
So if possible it's better to go in person and explain. My 2 cents.
I am in a similar situation. "guyfromsg" , you are correct about the 'last action rule'.
1) My old Visa(stamped on my passport) was from Oct 1 2005 - Oct 1 2008.
2) In 04/07, I moved to a new employer. New I797(and its corresponding I-94) is from 04/2007 - 04/2010.
3) Travelled outside US. Before returning, I didn't stamp a new Visa because my old Visa was still good. When returned in Jan 2008, at the POE , the officer issued a new I-94 and stamped the expiry date as Oct 1 2008. He mentioned that since the old visa was expiring on 2008 and because I didn't have a new Visa stamped (even though I had a new 797A) , he can't stamp the I-94 with the '2010' expiration date.
4) My attorney just raised a red flag. He mentioned that the 'last action rule' goes against me. The last
action in this case was 'issuance of a new I-94'. So, the best approach is to get it corrected at the
local CBP - Deferred Inspections Office. He is working on getting some paper work ready.
However, another way to get by this issue would have been to file for a H1-B renewal before my
new I-94(the one issued at the POE) expired.
My attorney explained that according to the new immigration laws, the CBP officer should have stamped the expiration date from the 'LATEST' 797A. Most of the times, the officer will just detach your
I-94 from the latest 797-A and stamp it. This way no one(foreign national + Customs) needs to maintain multiple I-94's. However, not all officers are updated with the current immigration laws and policies. Now I'm waiting for some response from the CBP. I will update this thread once I get some positive feedback.
Thanks for all the great info in this thread guys!!
regards
John.
hairstyles Actress Lara Flynn Boyle
Yeldarb
04-16 03:46 PM
Exactly, you have to be mature enough to be able to handle the responsibility. There isn't a set age for this. I know adults who still aren't mature enough.
saikrishn2000
01-26 09:39 AM
I see an update on jan 24 on this bill to grant 55000 visas for advance degree holders from DV lottery. Does this mean progress? Rest of the immigration bills never make it to the sub committee.
Jan 5th Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Jan 24th Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration Policy and Enforcement
Jan 5th Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Jan 24th Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration Policy and Enforcement
gcdreamer05
01-06 04:21 PM
Did any one tried filing single and then amend join in 2007 - can you share your experiences here ....
No comments:
Post a Comment