Onesimus
03-18 01:06 AM
@Jeff Wheeler : Thanks for the vote :)
I accidentally selected "No Vote" Haha! No vote for me.
I accidentally selected "No Vote" Haha! No vote for me.
wallpaper more soldier wallpaper. 2002 we were soldier wallpaper
srikondoji
06-18 08:56 AM
Franklin, sroym
IV is not an Indian organization. If this is one of the reasons why few non-indian members are not making donations then please re-consider your decision and start donating.
Also let us not dillute our fight by expanding the fight to include other problems. Once we achieve desired results, we can continue to pick up other problems and lead the fight.
--sri
As a non-indian joining IV lately, I feel IV is more an indian organization. I had communication with one of the moderators (core members of IV) and he clearly stated that retrogession is in IV's agenda, but FBI name check is not in IV's agenda as an organization. How come retrogession which is mostly a problem for indian immigrants in the agenda of this organization, but FBI name check which is a problem for most nationalities not in the agenda of this group(maybe with the exception of Europeans)? There are over 100 members at a yahoo group, and some more registered at an immigrationportal forum with common problem of FBI name check, cases delayed for 1, 2, 3 or more years because of name check. The registered use names suggest that there are from all over the world, yet no core members of IV is caring about this matter with the exception of one person who scheduled a conference call with an attorney in PA, but did not help any more. Sorry about my humble sincere feeling.
IV is not an Indian organization. If this is one of the reasons why few non-indian members are not making donations then please re-consider your decision and start donating.
Also let us not dillute our fight by expanding the fight to include other problems. Once we achieve desired results, we can continue to pick up other problems and lead the fight.
--sri
As a non-indian joining IV lately, I feel IV is more an indian organization. I had communication with one of the moderators (core members of IV) and he clearly stated that retrogession is in IV's agenda, but FBI name check is not in IV's agenda as an organization. How come retrogession which is mostly a problem for indian immigrants in the agenda of this organization, but FBI name check which is a problem for most nationalities not in the agenda of this group(maybe with the exception of Europeans)? There are over 100 members at a yahoo group, and some more registered at an immigrationportal forum with common problem of FBI name check, cases delayed for 1, 2, 3 or more years because of name check. The registered use names suggest that there are from all over the world, yet no core members of IV is caring about this matter with the exception of one person who scheduled a conference call with an attorney in PA, but did not help any more. Sorry about my humble sincere feeling.
jamesbond007
11-13 01:59 PM
^^
Pappu,
I am assuming that you are looking for someone who was "layed" off; not necessarily just the end of their contract??
May be you ought to expand the criteria to also include anyone who has changed their full time job will-fully?
Pappu,
I am assuming that you are looking for someone who was "layed" off; not necessarily just the end of their contract??
May be you ought to expand the criteria to also include anyone who has changed their full time job will-fully?
2011 hot Britney Spears Hair
nomi
12-11 02:17 PM
Originally Posted by god_bless_you
SO if USCIS wants to make a new rule of filing I485 for the one whose I 140 is cleared and priority date is not current, It CAN DO That RULE Right?
We do not need any Congress approval for that Right?
If so can we explore this option??
I agree with you. Why we don`t explore this option ???? USCIS make so many rule by itself then why they don`t make this rule to file 485 while PD is not current without going in Senate. Like they start premium processing of I-140. They make this rule without any bill in US Senate. correct me if I am wrong
I think, core team should look this option or ask us to find more information about it. I think, core team can meet with high official from USCIS.
what do you guys think about it ??
thx.
SO if USCIS wants to make a new rule of filing I485 for the one whose I 140 is cleared and priority date is not current, It CAN DO That RULE Right?
We do not need any Congress approval for that Right?
If so can we explore this option??
I agree with you. Why we don`t explore this option ???? USCIS make so many rule by itself then why they don`t make this rule to file 485 while PD is not current without going in Senate. Like they start premium processing of I-140. They make this rule without any bill in US Senate. correct me if I am wrong
I think, core team should look this option or ask us to find more information about it. I think, core team can meet with high official from USCIS.
what do you guys think about it ??
thx.
more...
cagedcactus
11-08 11:48 AM
Hi friends,
I am from south east Michigan just like everyone else here standing in the never ending line of gruesome and crippled immigration system.
Let us come together and help IV achieve our goals.
It is high time, that we ask for what we deserve. And it wont come unless we stand up for ourselves.
thanks....
I am from south east Michigan just like everyone else here standing in the never ending line of gruesome and crippled immigration system.
Let us come together and help IV achieve our goals.
It is high time, that we ask for what we deserve. And it wont come unless we stand up for ourselves.
thanks....
janey6152
June 7th, 2004, 07:56 PM
I currently have the Canon Powershot S50 which i'm selling.
Looking into the minolta Dimage A2 and the Olympus C5060.
Looking to spend about 1300.
I mainly take indoor shots . and looking to print pics as big as 11 x 17
Got the epson 1270 printer .
any suggestion would be appreciated..
thanks janey
Looking into the minolta Dimage A2 and the Olympus C5060.
Looking to spend about 1300.
I mainly take indoor shots . and looking to print pics as big as 11 x 17
Got the epson 1270 printer .
any suggestion would be appreciated..
thanks janey
more...
lord_labaku
01-11 12:15 AM
I have been there. done that. As soon as ported labor applicant using AC21 moves on & finally gets his GC, his labor cannot be ported anymore; even though you filed to use his labor before he obtained his/her GC.
Mind you, I used labor substitute not from a shady consulting company but from a reputed nasdaq listed company & had top lawyers appealing and proving my case. No use.
I think AC21 & labor substitution fundamentally had these issues where they could not co-exist. Since labor substitution was prone to abuse anyway. It was done away with. Good riddance to bad rubbish I say. Just I had to spend 3 years in limbo. What can I say - only solace is that there are others who are worse of than me.
Move on. Theres no point appealing this denial of I140.
Mind you, I used labor substitute not from a shady consulting company but from a reputed nasdaq listed company & had top lawyers appealing and proving my case. No use.
I think AC21 & labor substitution fundamentally had these issues where they could not co-exist. Since labor substitution was prone to abuse anyway. It was done away with. Good riddance to bad rubbish I say. Just I had to spend 3 years in limbo. What can I say - only solace is that there are others who are worse of than me.
Move on. Theres no point appealing this denial of I140.
2010 more.
bugsbunny
05-05 01:00 PM
lol i gave you green for the helpful entertainment ;)
more...
logiclife
07-02 12:30 AM
(7/1/2006)UPDATE
THERE WILL BE ANOTHER INTERVIEW NEXT WEEK ON JUL 8TH (Saturday), ON LEGAL IMMIGRATION ON SAME CHANNEL AT 4:00 EST ON SAME PROGRAM "COURTYARD" on KPFK. PLEASE SEE BELOW ON THE DETAILS AND VARIOUS OPTIONS TO LISTEN INTO THE PROGRAM AS WELL AS CALL-IN FOR QUESTIONS/COMMENTS.
----------------------------------------
THERE WILL BE ANOTHER INTERVIEW NEXT WEEK ON JUL 8TH (Saturday), ON LEGAL IMMIGRATION ON SAME CHANNEL AT 4:00 EST ON SAME PROGRAM "COURTYARD" on KPFK. PLEASE SEE BELOW ON THE DETAILS AND VARIOUS OPTIONS TO LISTEN INTO THE PROGRAM AS WELL AS CALL-IN FOR QUESTIONS/COMMENTS.
----------------------------------------
hair more.
dealsnet
08-18 10:35 AM
Few years ago, USCIS did approved EB2 with 3 year degrees.
But now they are very strict. They are refering into EDGE (Electronic Database for Global Education) database, created by American Association of Collegiate Registars and Admissions Officers (AACRAO) which didn't equate 3 year Indian degree with US equivalent bachelors.
Check thier website www.aacrao.org
There might be very few cases 3 years degree approved in EB2 category. Try in EB3.
If you don't care about money try one application in EB3 then try to port it to EB2.
But now they are very strict. They are refering into EDGE (Electronic Database for Global Education) database, created by American Association of Collegiate Registars and Admissions Officers (AACRAO) which didn't equate 3 year Indian degree with US equivalent bachelors.
Check thier website www.aacrao.org
There might be very few cases 3 years degree approved in EB2 category. Try in EB3.
If you don't care about money try one application in EB3 then try to port it to EB2.
more...
alinaturkova
01-15 12:48 PM
This is not a valid reasoning. The "no" is not related to immigration intent. It is related to if you made factually correct statements.
You need to *prove* that you have no intention for immigrating to US. Your intention is within your head; it does not start from any given date or given action by USCIS. The IO needs to "read your mind". The legal standard is that the court concedes that no one can know for sure what one's intentions are, however, the immigration officer can make a reasonable guess at the intentions by observing the actions you took or someone else took on your behalf.
In your case:
1. Someone filed I-130 for you. This is for permanent immigration to US.
2. You have family ties in US.
3. You have traveled to US before (I do not know how frequently).
4. You want to join a university that does not even have your major; that too you do not know what exactly you will study in that university. This itself is a very strong indication (at least in my mind) that you are not really interested in the education, but you applied to that university just for coming to US.
All together, it shows a clear pattern of observable evidence that your intention is to immigrate to US.
Thank you for your response raysaikat! Could you please rephrase your first part of the answer "This is not a valid reasoning. The "no" is not related to immigration intent. It is related to if you made factually correct statements."? It's a bit confusing.
You're saying I need to *prove* that I have no intention for immigrating to US. Do you mean that they must clearly see that I have no intention to stay in the US after I finish college? The I-130 form is pending so it's obvious I have such intentions. However, the process takes a very long time. Do you think that if I prove that I plan to go back home after school and then wait for the process in my home country I'll be issued a visa? Do they have information regarding the "I-130" process in their database? I mean there is a chance they don't even ask about it. Well, last time we applied they didn't.
Also, do you think that my previous false response to the application form question could in some way affect my I-130 process? I mean I've returned back so in my understanding it shouldn't be a problem. Please explain.
If I get lucky and get a visa issued. What happens next? Is it easy to switch to a working "H1B" visa from "F-1" visa and maintain this status until the end of the "I-130" process? I mean switching to "H1B" after I finish college. Is it ok to leave the country while on "H1B" status while "I-130" pending? Please comment. Thank you.
You need to *prove* that you have no intention for immigrating to US. Your intention is within your head; it does not start from any given date or given action by USCIS. The IO needs to "read your mind". The legal standard is that the court concedes that no one can know for sure what one's intentions are, however, the immigration officer can make a reasonable guess at the intentions by observing the actions you took or someone else took on your behalf.
In your case:
1. Someone filed I-130 for you. This is for permanent immigration to US.
2. You have family ties in US.
3. You have traveled to US before (I do not know how frequently).
4. You want to join a university that does not even have your major; that too you do not know what exactly you will study in that university. This itself is a very strong indication (at least in my mind) that you are not really interested in the education, but you applied to that university just for coming to US.
All together, it shows a clear pattern of observable evidence that your intention is to immigrate to US.
Thank you for your response raysaikat! Could you please rephrase your first part of the answer "This is not a valid reasoning. The "no" is not related to immigration intent. It is related to if you made factually correct statements."? It's a bit confusing.
You're saying I need to *prove* that I have no intention for immigrating to US. Do you mean that they must clearly see that I have no intention to stay in the US after I finish college? The I-130 form is pending so it's obvious I have such intentions. However, the process takes a very long time. Do you think that if I prove that I plan to go back home after school and then wait for the process in my home country I'll be issued a visa? Do they have information regarding the "I-130" process in their database? I mean there is a chance they don't even ask about it. Well, last time we applied they didn't.
Also, do you think that my previous false response to the application form question could in some way affect my I-130 process? I mean I've returned back so in my understanding it shouldn't be a problem. Please explain.
If I get lucky and get a visa issued. What happens next? Is it easy to switch to a working "H1B" visa from "F-1" visa and maintain this status until the end of the "I-130" process? I mean switching to "H1B" after I finish college. Is it ok to leave the country while on "H1B" status while "I-130" pending? Please comment. Thank you.
hot tattoo Best Call of duty
ebizash
04-30 03:05 PM
A great blog! I completely agree with everything mentioned.
more...
house 2010
Libra
10-03 03:08 PM
cchaitu,
no you dont see anything abt FP on 485 status. If you haven't called USCIS, you can call once and see, it may help.
no you dont see anything abt FP on 485 status. If you haven't called USCIS, you can call once and see, it may help.
tattoo brunette hair with blonde
vin13
10-07 01:32 PM
This is a very sad story..But something doesnt sound right...the son was 19 and studying UCLA and he was killed too?....
more...
pictures tattoo asian boy hairstyle.
Desertfox
10-06 07:58 PM
You mean the 6 bodies found in LA belong to an Indian American family?
dresses 2011 glass blocks home
english_august
09-20 10:36 PM
I thought that was the point of this thread. If someone has the video, please upload it to You Tube so that I can provide a link to it. I've heard that Congressman McDermott said that Pankaj sang the national anthem even better than him!!
more...
makeup tattoo To look sexy like Megan
humdesi
11-22 02:15 PM
Well said, No one here is going to let go an opporturnity here, if one gets one. In my case, I did NOT go in search of one, and I did not get one. So waiting in line for years. that said, If I had got an option, I would have taken advantage of it. This guy does deserves his GC. Anyway, he/she has been here since 1997 and it is a long time too.
Lot of people have been around for a long time. Each of us have a story why our PD is not earlier. One thing is guaranteed - bulletin dates will not progress or progress very slowly as more and more labor substituters take away visa numbers.
Another thing - People from 2003/2004 are taking visa numbers. Almost 40% of EB-2 numbers were taken as of first week of Nov (as per latest bulletin). By end of Nov that number might well be 50%, 60%, or 70% - who knows.
It's going to be a loooong wait.
Lot of people have been around for a long time. Each of us have a story why our PD is not earlier. One thing is guaranteed - bulletin dates will not progress or progress very slowly as more and more labor substituters take away visa numbers.
Another thing - People from 2003/2004 are taking visa numbers. Almost 40% of EB-2 numbers were taken as of first week of Nov (as per latest bulletin). By end of Nov that number might well be 50%, 60%, or 70% - who knows.
It's going to be a loooong wait.
girlfriend more.
mhathi
02-19 04:02 PM
I wouldn't want Laloo to get his paws on my money. It is better in a Swiss account. :-)
Dude, I am sure a lot of that money in these accounts belongs to the same "Railbay Meeneester' you are talking about..
:D
Dude, I am sure a lot of that money in these accounts belongs to the same "Railbay Meeneester' you are talking about..
:D
hairstyles glass blocks home depot_25.
raajpagare
01-24 04:46 AM
I have receiived the exact same RFE and the interesting thing is that my company is neither a staffing or a consulting company. Its a services and product based company.
The RFE states that if the petitioner is engaged in consulting or staffing, then send the supporting documents. But my company is not, so what are we suppoesed to send? Will write back on monday what the lawyer says.
The RFE states that if the petitioner is engaged in consulting or staffing, then send the supporting documents. But my company is not, so what are we suppoesed to send? Will write back on monday what the lawyer says.
bugsbunny
04-11 10:25 PM
2)How long I485 will take to process after becoming current priority date
Pls post your answers below
TEXAS---
NEBRASAKA----
Thanks
slns
don't quite get your question but you may find it in the tracker here...by comparing it to the visa bulletins
http://immigrationvoice.org/tracker/tracker.php?view=2
Pls post your answers below
TEXAS---
NEBRASAKA----
Thanks
slns
don't quite get your question but you may find it in the tracker here...by comparing it to the visa bulletins
http://immigrationvoice.org/tracker/tracker.php?view=2
needhelp!
09-19 01:01 AM
I could have rallied all night..
And still have begged for more
I could have spread my wings
And done a thousand things
I've never done before
I never know what made it so
EXCITING!!
And still have begged for more
I could have spread my wings
And done a thousand things
I've never done before
I never know what made it so
EXCITING!!
No comments:
Post a Comment